Element 14 to Bake Custom Raspberry Pi’s

Element14 on Tuesday revealed an exclusive agreement to offer OEM customers bespoke designs based on theRaspberry Pi platform.

Raspberry Pi — which has seen success in the educational and maker fields — is targeting commercial manufacturers and the Internet of Things, signing up Premier Farnell through the latter’s element14 brand to customize its boards.

Customizations will include reconfiguring the Raspberry Pi board layout, adding functionality, redesigning the interfaces, and changing the board and memory configurations.

element 14 raspberry pi board reconfiguration diagram

Minimum order quantity is 3,000 to 5,000 units. Pricing and lead times will be calculated individually for each project.

An order of 3,000 to 5,000 units “is low enough that it could be used in a wide variety of applications, ranging from new consumer platforms to industrial automation,” said Jim McGregor, principal analyst atTirias Research. “It wouldn’t limit the potential.”

However, in the IoT, “the greater trend is to integrate into a single piece of silicon, like what Freescale’s doing with the SCM module,” he told LinuxInsider.

The Life of Raspberry Pi

The first version of the Raspberry Pi had a Broadcom BCM2835 system on a chip, consisting of a 700-MHz ARM1176JZF-S processor and a VideoCore IV GPU. It had 256 GMB of RAM, later upgraded to 512 MB.

The Raspberry Pi Foundation last year launched its Compute Module, which consists of the Broadcom BCM2835 SoC and an eMMC flash chip for use in embedded systems.

The Raspberry Pi 2, which has a Broadcom BCM2836 SoC with a quad-core ARM Cortex-A7 CPU, a VideoCore IV dual-core GPU and 1 GB of RAM, launched earlier this year.

Any of the Raspberry Pi boards and accessories will be customized, and all will use the Broadcom SoC.

Will OEMs Bite?

“This potentially reduces time to market and development costs,” said Tom Hackenberg, a principal analyst atIHS.

For modifying existing applications, customization “can represent an inexpensive solution used to add functionality such as connectivity driven by the IoT trend to existing devices without changing the existing board,” he told LinuxInsider.

For new applications, a customized Pi “can represent a jump-start to the complete device design at a considerable cost savings compared to designing from scratch or using traditional embedded computer boards, which have a lot more invested in scalable, validated and tested designs,” Hackenberg said.

OEMs indeed are prototyping with low-priced CPU boards such as the BeagleBoard, Arduino and Raspberry Pi, Bill Weinberg, senior director of open source strategy atBlack Duck Software.

Element14 “seems willing to spin minor to fairly major mods to the basic Raspberry Pi design for a modest uptick from COTS pricing,” he told LinuxInsider.

Makers and IoT Players Will Love This

Manufacturers are not likely to change their fully bespoke practices “to embrace this new Pi of a thousand faces” because each vertical has its own hardware and performance requirements that are better met by specific SOCs and ancillary chips with aggressive price points, Weinberg remarked.

However, customized Pis “will be a huge boon to the maker movement and to startups building IoT devices,” he suggested, as they “generally lack negotiating leverage for favorable silicon pricing and also are new to hardware design and manufacturing.”

For such customers, the customizable Raspberry Pi “will be a shot in the arm, a tonic to get them from raw MVP to product-grade volume in months instead of years,” Weinberg said.

“It’s more difficult to get these segments to commit to minimum production volumes,” said Tirias Research‘s MacGregor. Still, customization “creates a broader appeal for the Raspberry Pi ecosystem that now extends through commercial applications.”

Richard Adhikari has written about high-tech for leading industry publications since the 1990s and wonders where it's all leading to. Will implanted RFID chips in humans be the Mark of the Beast? Will nanotech solve our coming food crisis? Does Sturgeon's Law still hold true? You can connect with Richard on Google+.

2 Comments

  • CORRECTION to previous post–

    "What’s really telling is that the Uptons have been forced, in the last few weeks, to admit that only about 2 out of 7 of their sales have been to the children originally targeted."…

    Should have read…

    "What’s really telling is that the Uptons have been forced, in the last few weeks, to admit that only about 2 out of 7 of their sales have been into channels which can only be loosely identified, classified, or categorized as having ANYTHING to do with ‘education’. It is much more probable that 100 000, 200 000, perhaps as many as 300 000–rather than 2 million–schoolchildren are actively involved in using the RPi. It is also just as likely that Letters of Intent, Potential Contracts, actual Contracts, and outright sales of product allows the discussion of "…sales of two million…".

    Not to put TOO fine a point on this discussion, but nothing is ever made of the fact that these big-money decisions are made by ADMINISTRATORS, who have NO idea as to what is required to actually TEACH the material demanded by the Raspberry Pi.

    The Uptons obviously never learned R. Frost–

    "…I have miles to go before I sleep…"

    Perhaps they should.

  • It’s really sad, but the track being taken by the Raspberry Pi seems to be anything BUT the humanitarian venture originally proposed, from the original too-burdened weak design to the latest design shortcomings, consisting of half-baked "OEM" offerings, ‘new’ modules using old technology, and an absolute disaster of a display.
    What’s really telling is that the Uptons have been forced, in the last few weeks, to admit that only about 2 out of 7 of their sales have been to the children originally targeted.
    From–figuratively–day one, when one of the Uptons said that theirs was a "…fractal marketing plan…", it has been painfully obvious that there has been no plan, except to continually "play catch-up".
    From the beginning–too little, too late; long-range goals and planning were completely ignored.
    Eben, however, is to be wholeheartedly commended for his vision which is no less valid now than it was.

Leave a Comment

Please sign in to post or reply to a comment. New users create a free account.

LinuxInsider Channels